<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://evpl.org/community/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Movies Blog : Sherlock Holmes</title><link>http://evpl.org/community/blogs/movies/archive/tags/Sherlock+Holmes/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: Sherlock Holmes</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 SP1 (Build: 30619.63)</generator><item><title>Sherlock Holmes is taking back "deduction" from the IRS</title><link>http://evpl.org/community/blogs/movies/archive/2010/04/10/sherlock-holmes-is-taking-back-quot-deduction-quot-from-the-irs.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 16:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">9a7b961d-7882-4302-b701-732ca0e566f2:2144</guid><dc:creator>E-Ville Librarian@evpl</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://evpl.org/community/blogs/movies/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=2144</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://evpl.org/community/blogs/movies/archive/2010/04/10/sherlock-holmes-is-taking-back-quot-deduction-quot-from-the-irs.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;I was really skeptical about the quality of the new &amp;quot;&lt;a title="EVPL Link" href="http://evans.evpl.org/search~S0?/tsherlock%20holmes%20v/tsherlock+holmes+v/1%2C2%2C8%2CB/frameset&amp;amp;FF=tsherlock+holmes+videorecording&amp;amp;7%2C%2C7"&gt;Sherlock Holmes&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; when I saw how quickly it came to video.&amp;nbsp; However, &lt;a title="EVPL link" href="http://evans.evpl.org/search~S0?/adowney%20robert/adowney+robert/1%2C3%2C40%2CB/exact&amp;amp;FF=adowney+robert+1965&amp;amp;1%2C38%2C"&gt;Robert Downey Jr.&lt;/a&gt; has again left me thankful this actor didn&amp;#39;t end his days the way of Belushi or Farley.&amp;nbsp; Every time this guy puts on a character role I find myself entertained.&amp;nbsp; Whether it is channeling real-life characters like journalist &lt;a title="EVPL link" href="http://evans.evpl.org/search/t?SEARCH=soloist%20v"&gt;Steve Lopez&lt;/a&gt; or the superhero swagger of &lt;a title="EVPL link" href="http://evans.evpl.org/search~S0?/tiron%20man%20v/tiron+man+v/1%2C2%2C6%2CB/exact&amp;amp;FF=tiron+man+videorecording&amp;amp;1%2C5%2C"&gt;Tony Stark (AKA Ironman)&lt;/a&gt;, Downey presents his viewers with a believable portrayal every time.&amp;nbsp; In the case of Sherlock, Downey presents an eccentric take on the classic character that will no doubt leave traditionalist with a sour taste.&amp;nbsp; I on the other hand liked the new take on the original.&amp;nbsp; Sherlock&amp;#39;s eccentricity seemed believable, and the shoot-em-up directing of the ex-Mr.-Madge (&lt;a title="EVPL link" href="http://evans.evpl.org/search/a?SEARCH=ritchie%20guy"&gt;Guy Ritchie&lt;/a&gt;) is the director&amp;#39;s best since &amp;quot;Snatch.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; My main beef was with the familiartiy of the theme.&amp;nbsp; Anyone ever seen &amp;quot;Young Sherlock Holmes?&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; I loved it as a kid, but so must have Mr. Ritchie.&amp;nbsp; Chalk this one up as a guilty pleasure if you must, but I hope they make a sequel.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://evpl.org/community/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2144" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://evpl.org/community/blogs/movies/archive/tags/Sherlock+Holmes/default.aspx">Sherlock Holmes</category><category domain="http://evpl.org/community/blogs/movies/archive/tags/Robert+Downey+Jr_2E00_/default.aspx">Robert Downey Jr.</category><category domain="http://evpl.org/community/blogs/movies/archive/tags/Guy+Ritchie/default.aspx">Guy Ritchie</category></item></channel></rss>