<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://evpl.org/community/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results matching tags 'tv shows', 'converter box', and 'Barack Obama'</title><link>http://evpl.org/community/search/SearchResults.aspx?a=1&amp;o=DateDescending&amp;tag=tv+shows,converter+box,Barack+Obama&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results matching tags 'tv shows', 'converter box', and 'Barack Obama'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 SP1 (Build: 30619.63)</generator><item><title>The day that never comes: The DTV Transition (UPDATE: House says &amp;quot;No!&amp;quot;)</title><link>http://evpl.org/community/blogs/movies/archive/2009/01/27/the-day-that-never-comes-the-dtv-transition.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:51:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">9a7b961d-7882-4302-b701-732ca0e566f2:1196</guid><dc:creator>professor.knowsitall@evpl</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;UPDATED 1/28 2:00PM:&lt;/strong&gt; Earlier today, House Republicans &lt;a title="Yahoo! Tech news story" href="http://tech.yahoo.com/news/ap/20090128/ap_on_hi_te/tec_digital_tv_transition" target="_blank"&gt;defeated&lt;/a&gt; the proposed delay of the DTV transition.&amp;nbsp; It&amp;#39;s still set for February 17.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Below is my original blog post, published on January 27.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="float:left;margin-right:7px;" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3487/3232410798_70d4a3a41e_t.jpg" alt="Evil DTV Monster" width="100" height="97" /&gt;ANOTHER delay.&amp;nbsp; Yesterday, the US Senate voted unanimously to&amp;nbsp;postpone the DTV transition from February 17 to June 12.&amp;nbsp; The proposal, supported by President Barack Obama, could receive Congressional approval very soon.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On January 1, the Commerce Department announced that they&amp;#39;d run out of funding for government-subsidized vouchers toward the purchase of digital converter boxes.&amp;nbsp; There are currently 2.6 million Americans on a waiting list, in case additional funding comes to fruition.&amp;nbsp; The goal of the four month delay is to find the funds to make this happen.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to a &lt;a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/65-million-us-homes-unready-for-digital-tv-transition/" target="_blank"&gt;Nielsen report&lt;/a&gt; published last week, more than 6.5 million households are not prepared for the DTV transition.&amp;nbsp; Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller, author of the bill to push back the deadline, stated &amp;quot;I firmly believe that our nation is not yet ready to make this transition at this time.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style="float:right;margin-left:7px;" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3316/3231561261_e9e3b908ff_m.jpg" alt="This guy&amp;#39;s not a procrastinator!" width="240" height="123" /&gt;That &amp;quot;6.5 million households&amp;quot; sounds awfully large,&amp;nbsp;but it makes up only 5.7% of American households.&amp;nbsp; Even if the deadline is pushed back, and the voucher program is reinstated, will these households stop procrastinating and actually purchase converter boxes?&amp;nbsp; Or will they simply have another four months to put it off?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of course, broadcasters don&amp;#39;t like the idea as they&amp;#39;ll have to continue broadcasts in both analog &amp;amp; digital, which is more costly; in fact, some have already scheduled the dismantling of their analog broadcasting equipment.&amp;nbsp; But Rockefeller managed to ease some of these concerns by allowing broadcast stations to make the switch from analog to digital signals sooner than the June deadline if they choose.&amp;nbsp; Um, what?!?&amp;nbsp; Won&amp;#39;t most stations switch to digital-only immediately?&amp;nbsp; If so, what&amp;#39;s the point of moving the &amp;quot;transition&amp;quot; to June?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nothing is final yet, but we should know the fine details if/when Congress approves it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Good idea?&amp;nbsp; Bad idea?&amp;nbsp; Let us know what you think by posting your (non-political) comments below!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>